Share this Article
Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Twitter Icon

Freeman Law is a tax, white-collar, and litigation boutique law firm. We offer unique and valued counsel, insight, and experience. Our firm is where clients turn when the stakes are high and the issues are complex.


A conspiracy is defined under 18 U.S.C. § 371 as an agreement between two or more parties to commit a federal crime. Because the accused does not have to successfully carry out its objective to be charged and convicted, conspiracy is referred to as an “inchoate” crime, although there must nonetheless be an overt act. Federal law penalizes conspiracies under 18 U.S.C. § 371 as misdemeanors or felonies, depending on the classification of the underlying federal crimes.

Federal crimes that often give rise to conspiracy charges include:

Because conspiracy is defined as the act of conspiring to commit a crime, which is a separate offense from the underlying substantive crime, defendants can be charged with conspiracy in addition to the crime supporting the charge.

Who Can Be Charged with Conspiracy? 

Any legal person can be charged with conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371 including corporations, unincorporated associations, and other types of organizations. This means that a conspiracy can exist between any combination of two persons, whether they are individuals or entities. Entities can be held liable for the actions of their officers, employees, and agents when they conspire to commit a federal offense, at least in part, for the entity’s benefit.

Elements of Conspiracy

To convict a defendant of conspiracy the government must prove the following:

The Agreement

The most fundamental aspect of a conspiracy charge is the agreement. Nevertheless, to support such a charge, an agreement need not be formal or in-depth and its existence can be inferred from the circumstances. This allows prosecutors to charge conspiracy based on circumstantial evidence, even without proof that a co-conspirator ever communicated a plot to commit a crime.

Overt Act

In addition to proving the existence of an agreement, prosecutors must show that at least one party to the conspiracy made an overt act in furtherance of the substantive crime. This requirement serves to ensure convictions are based on actual plans to commit a crime, as distinguished from “mere talk.”

The overt act does not have to be illegal and is often something innocuous, such as:

Typically, any act in furtherance of the crime is enough for a conviction.

Penalty and Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. § 371

Penalties for conspiracy convictions include:

Defending Against a Conspiracy Charge

Conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 37 is a commonly charged crime. Federal prosecutors sometimes bring conspiracy charges because they allow for presentation of a broader scope of evidence than would be permissible if the government charged only the underlying crime.

If you have been charged with conspiracy, note that the government has substantial resources to draw upon in conspiracy cases. Law enforcement agencies such as the FBI, DEA, Department of Labor, and the IRS sometimes devote significant time, energy, and manpower to these types of investigations.

When confronting such charges, the earlier you find competent, experienced legal counsel the better. In addition to constructing the best defense possible while conducting a thorough investigation of the charges against you and of the evidence, your attorney functions as a buffer between you and law enforcement.


White Collar Defense Lawyers

Accused of tax evasion, wire fraud,  conspiracy, or a RICO crime? Contact us as soon as possible to discuss your rights and the ways we can assist in your defense. We handle all types of cases, including complex international tax fraud allegations. Schedule a consultation or call (214) 984-3000 to discuss your allegations and investigations concerns.