A Modest Proposal For The Next Relief Bill: Bring Back Miscellaneous Itemized Deductions

Share this Article
Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Twitter Icon
Jason B. Freeman

Jason B. Freeman

Managing Member


Mr. Freeman is the founding member of Freeman Law, PLLC. He is a dual-credentialed attorney-CPA, author, law professor, and trial attorney.

Mr. Freeman has been named by Chambers & Partners as among the leading tax and litigation attorneys in the United States and to U.S. News and World Report’s Best Lawyers in America list. He is a former recipient of the American Bar Association’s “On the Rise – Top 40 Young Lawyers” in America award. Mr. Freeman was named the “Leading Tax Controversy Litigation Attorney of the Year” for the State of Texas for 2019 and 2020 by AI.

Mr. Freeman has been recognized multiple times by D Magazine, a D Magazine Partner service, as one of the Best Lawyers in Dallas, and as a Super Lawyer by Super Lawyers, a Thomson Reuters service. He has previously been recognized by Super Lawyers as a Top 100 Up-And-Coming Attorney in Texas.

Mr. Freeman currently serves as the chairman of the Texas Society of CPAs (TXCPA). He is a former chairman of the Dallas Society of CPAs (TXCPA-Dallas). Mr. Freeman also served multiple terms as the President of the North Texas chapter of the American Academy of Attorney-CPAs. He has been previously recognized as the Young CPA of the Year in the State of Texas (an award given to only one CPA in the state of Texas under 40).

As previously published in Forbes by Jason B. Freeman.


As the pandemic surges on, Congress is increasingly pressing for a new stimulus bill.  Rumored topics include, among others, liability reform, health care, stimulus checks, and tax relief.  While everyone and their legislator is making a wish list for pet provisions, it seems an opportune time for a modest proposal:  Bring back miscellaneous itemized deductions—they were unceremoniously suspended by the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”), but would provide much-needed relief in line with other recent tax amendments in the CARES Act.

Now if you find yourself asking what exactly a “miscellaneous itemized deduction” is, and wondering why you should care, think of the paradigm example: an employee’s unreimbursed business expenses.  The TCJA penalized many employees by making them non-deductible.  Why?  It was all about math—and some quirky rules for pushing tax legislation through the sausage factory.  Miscellaneous itemized deductions were on the chopping block because their head netted a cool $1.2 trillion for federal coffers over the course of a decade, at least under budgetary scoring estimates.  But few legislators, if any, initially set out to roll them back.  It kind of just happened.

The Proposal Would Benefit Employees

The theme behind the CARES Act and its Paycheck Protection Program has been to safeguard employees and the workforce—to make funds available to employers so that those funds trickle down to employees.  The proposal here, while modest, would result in funds going directly to employees, no middleman needed.  The TCJA’s suspension of miscellaneous itemized deductions was perhaps its biggest “trap for the unwary” and was roundly criticized as unfair to many employees.  But more recently, the CARES Act, in an effort to stem the tide of a coronavirus-induced economic slowdown, introduced numerous retroactive amendments to the TCJA—amendments that peeled back some of its harsh tax consequences for small businesses.  It was part of a coordinated effort to provide employers with funds and the ability to keep employees paid.  While those changes (as welcome as they were) were fair game, no one seems to have even raised or discussed bringing miscellaneous itemized deductions back.  Hopefully this article makes that a relevant conversation.

Prior to the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”), the Tax Code allowed taxpayers to deduct a class of expenditures known as “miscellaneous itemized deductions,” subject to a few hoops.  Under section 67(a), an individual taxpayer could deduct expenses that fell into this bucket to the extent that they exceeded 2% of the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income (“AGI”).  AGI is that magic number on the last line of the first page of Form 1040 that serves as a basis for calculating many deductions.  And with taxpayer AGI’s dropping across the board this year, the ability to take miscellaneous itemized deductions would have increased significantly.

The TCJA technically suspended miscellaneous itemized deductions by adding section 67(g) to the Internal Revenue Code.  Section (g) provides: “Notwithstanding subsection (a), no miscellaneous itemized deduction shall be allowed for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2026.

What are Miscellaneous Itemized Deductions

Now, good reader, back to a question that you probably asked at the beginning of this article: What exactly are these miscellaneous itemized deductions that we speak of?  Again, unreimbursed employee expenses are a prime example.  An employee who spends funds performing her job could—prior to the TCJA, at least—deduct those expenditures if they met the criteria for a miscellaneous itemized deduction.  But there are a host of other expenditures that fall into this category as well, including:

·  Investment fees and expenses;

·  Fees for tax return preparation;

·  Many legal fees for personal litigation;

·  Home office expenses;

·  Union or professional dues;

·  Educator expenses in excess of an amount deductible above the line

That’s right, prior to the TCJA, many teachers and educators who spent funds on their students and classroom materials were able to deduct some or all of those costs as miscellaneous itemized deductions.  To be sure, a special provision separately allowed for a single educator to deduct up to $250 of unreimbursed expenses, but amounts above this could generally not be deducted except as a miscellaneous itemized deduction.  Currently, that is not available.

The CARES Act Response and Tax Relief

Earlier this year, in response to the pandemic, Congress rightly implemented a number of tax reform provisions through the CARES Act.  Those provisions included retroactive amendments to the TCJA, such as:

·  Removing TCJA restrictions on deducting and carrying back net operating losses;

·  Removing TCJA restrictions on deducting business interest;

·  Removing TCJA restrictions on deducting excess business losses;

·  Removing TCJA restrictions on bonus depreciation for Qualified Improvement Property;

·  Removing TCJA restrictions on corporate Alternative Minimum Tax Credits.

These provisions were primarily aimed at businesses in an effort to help infuse capital (by way of tax refunds) that would help them continue operations and keep their workforces in place as the economy slowed.  The proposal here would provide relief directly to that workforce.  While we are at it, why not lower the 2% floor as well?

As the COVID-19 pandemic marches on, economic uncertainty remains.  Congress and Beltway thinktanks are pondering a host of legislative band aids and stimulus measures.  To date, outside of stimulus rebates (which are really an advance against the taxpayer’s future tax refund), the main tax weapons have utilized employers as the middleman to push funds down to employees.  There is nothing wrong with that.  But how about trying a more direct approach as part of the effort?


In the meantime, taxpayers may want to consider consulting with a tax professional to discuss other legitimate planning methods to take advantage of deductions that might otherwise be disqualified as miscellaneous itemized deductions under the TCJA.