Applicable Asset Acquisition | What to Know When Selling the Assets of a Business.

Share this Article
Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Twitter Icon

TL Fahring focuses on helping individuals and businesses with a wide variety of matters involving state, federal, and international taxation. He has represented clients in all stages of federal and state tax disputes, including audits, administrative appeals, litigation, and collection matters. Mr. Fahring also has used his tax knowledge to assist clients in planning complex domestic and international transactions, including advising as to potential reporting and withholding requirements.

Mr. Fahring received his J.D. from the University of Texas School of Law, where he graduated with high honors and was inducted into the Order of the Coif and Chancellors honors societies. After clerking for a year at the Texas Eleventh Court of Appeals, he attended New York University School of Law, where he received an LL.M. (Master of Laws) in Taxation and served as a student editor on the Tax Law Review.

In an “applicable asset acquisition,” the sale of the assets of a business may be subject to certain allocation and reporting requirements for federal income tax purposes. It’s essential for the seller and purchaser to be aware of these requirements.

What’s an Applicable Asset Acquisition?

An “applicable asset acquisition” is any transfer of assets which constitute a trade or business and with respect to which the transferee’s basis in such assets is determined wholly by reference to the consideration paid for such assets.[1] A group of assets is a trade or business if its character is such that goodwill or going concern value could under any circumstances attach to those assets.[2]

Goodwill is the value of a trade or business attributable to the expectancy of continued customer patronage, which may be due to the name or reputation of a trade or business or any other factor.[3] Going concern value is the additional value that attaches to property because of its existence as an integral part of an ongoing business activity.[4] Going concern value includes the value attributable to the ability of a trade or business (or a part of a trade or business) to continue functioning or generating income without interruption notwithstanding a change in ownership.[5] It also includes the value that is attributable to the immediate use or availability of an acquired trade or business, such as the use of the revenues or net earnings that otherwise would not be received during any period if the acquired trade or business were not available or operational.[6]

The basis of an asset generally is its cost as adjusted for various items including depreciation or amortization.[7] Thus, when an asset is sold, its basis generally is the consideration paid for that asset.[8]

What Happens in an Applicable Asset Acquisition?

The consideration received in an applicable asset acquisition has to be allocated among the assets that that make up this acquisition for purposes of determining both the transferee’s basis in such assets and the gain or loss of the transferor with respect to such acquisition.[9] The method of this allocation is usually referred as the “residual method.”

Under the residual method, the assets that make up the applicable asset acquisition are assigned to the following classes:

Other than goodwill and going concern value, Section 197 intangibles for purposes of determining Class VI assets include:

The consideration received in an applicable asset acquisition first gets reduced by the amount of Class I assets.[19] The remaining consideration is then allocated among the Class II assets, then among Class III assets, then among Class IV assets, then among Class V assets, then among Class VI assets according to the fair market value of the assets in each class at the time of acquisition. [20] Finally, anything left over gets allocated to Class VII assets.[21] If an asset in applicable asset acquisition is includible in more than one class, then it is included in that class with the lowest class number.[22] Thus, only the consideration remaining after allocations to all other tangible and intangible assets transferred as part of the applicable asset acquisition may be allocated to goodwill or going concern value.

If the transferor and transferee agree in writing as to the allocation of any amount of consideration to, or as to the fair market value of, any of the assets, such agreement is binding on them.[23] The parties to an applicable asset acquisition may dispute an allocation set forth in a written agreement only if they are able to show that the agreement is unenforceable because of mistake, undue influence, fraud, or duress.[24]

What are the Reporting Requirements for Applicable Asset Acquisitions?

Both the transferor and transferee are required to report information concerning the amount of consideration in an applicable asset acquisition and the allocation of that consideration among the assets transferred.[25] Both parties are required to file asset acquisition statements on Form 8594, “Asset Allocation Statement,” with their income tax returns or returns of income for the taxable year that includes the first date assets are sold pursuant to an applicable asset acquisition.[26]

Can the IRS Challenge the Parties Allocation of Consideration in an Applicable Asset Acquisition?

Short answer: Yes.

An allocation under an applicable asset acquisition is strictly scrutinized if the allocation does not have adverse tax consequences for the parties, because adverse tax interests deter allocations which lack economic reality.[27]

An example of where an allocation might be challenged is where amounts are allocated to goodwill versus covenants not to compete. Amounts allocated to goodwill or going concern value yield capital gain to the transferor.[28] On the other hand, amounts that a transferee pays to a transferor for a covenant not to compete results in ordinary income to the transferor.[29] Ordinary income currently is subject to federal income tax at marginal rates, with the top marginal rate currently being 37%.[30] Net capital gain may be subject to a reduced rate of federal income tax.[31]  The adjusted basis of a section 197 intangible (which, again, includes covenants not to compete, goodwill, and going concern value) are required to be amortized ratably over a 15-year period beginning with the month that the intangible was acquired.[32]

Thus, from a purchaser’s perspective, any consideration (and therefore basis) attributable to goodwill or a covenant not to compete would be amortizable in the same manner as basis attributable to other section 197 intangibles.[33] But, the seller may be able to obtain a reduced rate of federal income tax if the amount is allocated to goodwill rather than a covenant not to compete.

To schedule a consultation, please call 214.984.3000.

[1] 26 U.S.C. § 1060(c).

[2] 26 C.F.R. § 1.1060-1(b)(2)(i).

[3] Id. § 1.1060-1(b)(2)(i).

[4] Id.

[5] Id.

[6] Id.

[7] 26 U.S.C. §§ 1011, 1012, 1016.

[8] 26 U.S.C. § 1012.

[9] 26 U.S.C. § 1060(a).

[10] 26 C.F.R. § 1.338-6(b)(1).

[11] Id. § 1.338-6(b)(2)(ii).

[12] Id. § 1.338-6(b)(2)(iii).

[13] Id.

[14] Id. § 1.338-6(b)(2)(iv).

[15] Id. § 1.338-6(b)(2)(v).

[16] Id. § 1.338-6(b)(2)(vi).

[17] Id. § 1.338-6(b)(2)(vii).

[18] I.R.C. § 197(d)(1); Treas. Reg. § 1.338(b)(2)(vi).

[19] Id. § 1.338-6(b)(1).

[20] Id. § 1.338-6(b)(2)(i).

[21] Id. § 1.338-6(b)(2)(i).

[22] Id. § 1.338-6(b)(2)(i).

[23] 26 U.S.C. § 1060(a)(2); 26 C.F.R. § 1.1060-1(c)(4).

[24] 26 C.F.R. § 1.1060-1(c)(4).

[25] 26 C.F.R. § 1.1060-1(e)(1)(i).

[26] 26 C.F.R. § 1.1060-1(e)(1)(ii).

[27] Lorvic Holdings, Inc. v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 1998-281 (1998).

[28] See, e.g., Heritage Auto Center, Inc. v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 1996-21, 71 T.C.M. (CCH) 1839, 1844 (1996); Muskogee Radiological Group, Inc. v. Comm’r, TC Memo 1978-490.

[29] Ullman v. Comm’r, 264 F.2d 305 (2d Cir. 1959); Rev. Rul. 69-643.

[30] 26 U.S.C. § 1(j)(2).

[31] 26 U.S.C. § 1(h)(1).

[32] 26 U.S.C. § 197(a), (b) (c), (d)(1)(A), (B), (E).

[33] See Complex Media, Inv. v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2012-14 n. 28 (2012).