Texas Comptroller Adopts Amended Data Processing Rule

Share this Article
Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Twitter Icon

Mr. McMillan is an Associate of the firm. He specializes in Federal tax issues for corporations, partnerships, s-corporations, and individuals. Additionally, he has experience in general corporate and business law matters.

Mr. McMillan attended SMU Dedman School of Law and graduated in 2021. He began his employment at Freeman Law. In the Fall of 2022, he left the firm to receive an LL.M. in Taxation from the graduate tax program at NYU School of Law.

Prior to law school, he earned B.S. in Economics with Finance Applications and a Minor in Business from SMU. After graduation he worked for a mid-sized business specializing in strategic franchisee development and management. He utilizes this education and experience in his practice.

On March 28, 2025, the Texas Comptroller of Public Account (the “Comptroller”) finalized amendments to Rule 3.330, Data Processing Services, for purposes of the Texas sales and use tax.

What Does the Texas Tax Code Say?

The Texas Tax Code (the “Tax Code”) defines data processing as:

However, the Tax Code provides that data processing does not include:

In addition, the Tax Code explains that data storage, which is taxable under the general definition of data processing, does not include “a classified advertisement, banner advertisement, vertical advertisement, or link when the item is displayed on an Internet website owned by another person.”[3]

What Does Amended Rule 3.330 Say?

The amended rule generally defines a “data processing service” as the “computerized entry, retrieval, search, compilation, manipulation, or storage of data or information.”[4] The amended rule then goes on to track the definition of “data processing services” found in the Tax Code. Thus, “data processing services” include:

“Data processing services” do not include:

Where things get more interesting is in the amended rule’s discussion of ancillary services. The previous version of the rule provided that:

[d]ata processing does not include the use of a computer by a provider of other services when the computer is used to facilitate the performance of the service or the application of the knowledge of the physical sciences, accounting principles, and tax laws, e.g., the use of a computer to provide interpretive or enhancement geophysical services or the use of a computer by a CPA firm, enrolled agent, or bookkeeping firm to produce a financial report, prepare federal income tax, state franchise or sales tax returns, or charges for temporary secretarial personnel who as part of their function use word processing equipment.[7]

The amended rule expands on the reasoning behind this exclusion by providing that a “data processing service” does not include “data processing that is sold for a single charge with another service if the data processing service does not have a separate value, and the data processing service is ancillary to the other service.”[8]  In determining whether a data processing service is ancillary to another service, the Comptroller may consider:

The extent to which the service provider exercises discretion or judgment in individual applications of the processed data based on knowledge of the physical sciences, accounting principles, law, or other fields of study. The routine or repetitive manipulation of data by the seller is a factor suggesting that the data processing activity is not ancillary to another service and should be taxable as a data processing service. The manipulation of data that depends on the external knowledge and discretionary judgment of the service provider in individual applications suggests that the data processing activity is ancillary to another service and should not be taxable as a data processing service. The provider’s skill, experience, or expertise, in processing data or information, is not a factor. . . . The evaluation is based on what the service provider is doing, not on what the customer wants.”[9]

The rule lists examples of taxable and nontaxable data processing services and the rationale behind their categorization:

Closing Thoughts

If you have any questions about how these amendments may impact your business, don’t hesitate to contact us for a consultation.

[1] Id. § 151.0035(a)(1).

[2] Id. § 151.0035(a)(2).

[3] Id. § 151.0035(b).

[4] Amended Rule 3.330(a)(1).

[5] Rule 3.330(a)(1)(A).

[6] Rule 3.330(a)(1)(B).

[7] Former Rule 3.330(a)(1).

[8] Rule 3.330(a)(1)(C).

[9] Rule 3.330(a)(1)(C)(iv).

[10] Rule 3.330(b)(1).

[11] Rule 3.330(b)(2).

[12] Rule 3.330(b)(3).

[13] Rule 3.330(b)(4); see also 50 Tex. Reg. 2228.

[14] Id.

[15] Rule 3.330(b)(5).

[16] Rule 3.330(b)(6).

[17] Rule 3.330(b)(7). For the definition and taxability of cable television services, see Tex. Tax Code § 151.0033 and 34 Tex. Admin. Code § 3.313.

[18] Rule 3.330(b)(8). For the definition and taxability of amusement services, see Tex. Tax Code § 151.0028 and 34 Tex. Admin. Code § 3.298.

[19] Rule 3.330(b)(9).

[20] Rule 3.330(b)(10).

[21] Rule 3.330(b)(11).

[22] Rule 3.330(b)(12); see also STAR Accession No. 202402020L (Feb 20, 2024).