Tax Court In Brief | Donlan v. Commissioner, 164 T.C. 3| February 19, 2025| Buch, J. | Dkt. No. 16759-24

Share this Article
Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Twitter Icon
Devin M. Hludzik

Devin M. Hludzik

Attorney

469.998.8488
DHludzik@FreemanLaw.com

Ms. Hludzik represents clients in various stages of litigation, with a particular focus on federal tax controversies, as well as white-collar and financial disputes, both civil and criminal. She has experience on an array of issues, including IRS collections and federal investigations, and represents clients facing tax and white-collar or financial-related charges. Prior to joining private practice, Ms. Hludzik clerked for two judges at the United States Tax Court. 

Ms. Hludzik earned her B.S., cum laude, from the University of Central Florida. She earned her J.D., cum laude, from Charleston School of Law. After law school, she received her LL.M. in taxation from Georgetown University Law Center. Ms. Hludzik is licensed to practice in Texas and South Carolina.

Short Summary: The IRS filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction a petition timely filed by taxpayers using the Tax Court’s online petition generator. Petitions filed using the Tax Court’s online petition generator do not bear handwritten signatures and instead include a signature block with a taxpayer’s typewritten name and contact information. In this case, the IRS took the position that the petition was not properly signed by the taxpayers, and the Tax Court therefore lacked jurisdiction. Ultimately, the Tax Court disagreed with the IRS, denied its motion to dismiss, and concluded that the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure do not require handwritten signatures on electronic filings.

Key Issue: Whether an electronically filed petition containing a taxpayer’s typewritten signature is properly signed.

Primary Holdings: The Tax Court held that a person’s name on a signature block on a paper that the person authorized to be filed electronically constitutes the person’s signature, and therefore, the taxpayers’ petition was properly signed. The Tax Court also held that it has jurisdiction over electronically filed petitions containing such a signature.

Key Points of Law:

Tax Court rules addressing the allowance of electronic signatures:

Other authority addressing the allowance of electronic signatures:

Insights:  Because such a large number of taxpayers petitioning the Tax Court represent themselves, the Tax Court provides on its website Form 2, a simplified petition template, that they may use to initiate their case. Additionally, on July 31, 2024, and September 15, 2024, the Tax Court released online petition generators for use by pro se taxpayers and practitioners, respectively. In all material aspects, Form 2 petitions and those created with the online petition generator are identical; however, the two petitions look different upon their completion. Specifically, Form 2 petitions include a box for a traditional, handwritten signature, and generator-created petitions include a signature block containing a taxpayer’s typewritten name and contact information. In sum, the Tax Court’s rules “deem a taxpayer’s name on a signature block of a document that the taxpayer authorized to be filed electronically to be the taxpayer’s signature,” and thus, petitions created using the Tax Court’s online petition generator are properly signed.

If you have any questions regarding potential tax issues, Freeman Law can help. We offer value-driven legal services and provide practical solutions to complex tax issues. Click here to schedule a consultation or call our office at (214) 984-3000.