Recognition of Gain or Loss Upon Distribution of Stock and Securities of Controlled Corporations

Share this Article
Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Twitter Icon
Stephanie Uribe

Stephanie Uribe

International Tax Consultant

469.998.8492
suribe@freemanlaw.com

Ms. Uribe is an international tax consultant with more than a decade of professional experience in Mexican taxation and international tax advisory matters.  She maintains a particular focus on acquisitions (including due diligence), transfers, mergers, spin-offs, and various corporate reorganizations. She is experienced with cross-border transactions, including advising clients with respect to federal and state tax obligations in Mexico; the application of international tax treaties and the avoidance of double taxation, including permanent establishment status; complex international tax strategies; expatriate compensation plans; and tax audits.

Stephanie is certified to practice as an Enrolled Agent (“EA”) before the IRS in the U.S. As a certified EA, she brings a profound understanding of U.S. tax law, and with her background experience in other tax jurisdictions, she offers a fresh and innovative perspective on tax representation. Stephanie’s capabilities extend to efficiently handling audits, appeals, and tax collection disputes, as well as providing advice in tax planning and preparation in the U.S.

Stephanie received her law degree from the Facultad Libre de Derecho de Monterrey, in Monterrey, Mexico, where she graduated with honors, and holds a Master’s in Law in International Taxation from Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU), in Vienna, Austria. For her Master Thesis she published the Article “Taxation of Capital Gains: The Substantial Participation Clause in Article 13(5)” in Special Features of the UN Model Convention.

She is member of the International Fiscal Association and has participated as a speaker in several Mexican and international tax conferences. She holds a certification in Management (Harvard ManageMentor Program) from Harvard Business School.

Private Letter Ruling 202322015, 06/02/2023, IRC Sec. 355

Summary: Entity “A” is a corporation from country A and is the parent company of a global group. “A” owns all the stock of Corporation “B”. “A” and “B” own all the outstanding stock of Distributing. Distributing owns various corporations, disregarded entitites under Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-3 for U.S. tax purposes and partnerships. Distributing and its eligible members file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return as a group (“Distributing Group”). “A” and “B” financed the purchase and operations of Business B through intercompany advances (“Shareholder Advances”). The Shareholder Advances were made over several years and were not formally documented and no interest or principal payments were made. The IRS examined the Distributing Group’s 1 to 4 fiscal years tax returns and determined that the Shareholder Advances should be treated as equity rather than debt for tax purposes. The Shareholder Advances were recorded as paid-in capital on Distributing’s returns. On tax years 5 to 7, “B” made additional advances to Controlled and it intends to treat those advances as paid-in capital contributions. Distributing will depend on Business A, and Controlled will depend on Business B to meet the active trade or business criteria. See 26 U.S.C. § 355(b) and Rev. Proc. 2017-52.

Key Issue: Whether, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 355(b), Distributing may qualify as a valid corporate business? Does the separation of the business result in a gain or loss?

Primary Holdings and Support:

Yes, if Distributing complies with the separation requirements to be a valid corporate business under 26 U.S.C. § 355(b). Such as, (1) “B” is treated as a DRE for U.S. federal income tax purposes by filing a “check-the-box” election. See Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-3(c)(1). (2) “A”, “B”, and Distributing have an agreement in place. “A” directs Distributing to transfer all of the Controlled stock that “A” would have received from Distributing directly to “B”. Distributing transfers all of the Controlled stock directly to “B”. Distributing distributes all of the Controlled stock to “B”. (4) Distributing and Controlled will be responsible for their respective expenses related to the Distribution, if any. See Rev. Rul. 73-54, 1973-1 C.B. 187.

No gain or loss is realized under the following scenarios, when (1) A receives the Controlled stock during the Separation, in accordance with Section 355(a), (2) Distributing distributes the Controlled stock during the Separation, as specified in Section 355(c)(1). Moreover, if Distributing has any earnings and profits, they will be divided between Distributing and Controlled following the guidelines set out in 26 U.S.C. §  312(h), Treas. Reg. § 1.312-10(b), and Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-33(e)(3).

Key Points of Law: 

Distribution of stock and securities of a controlled corporation. Under  26 U.S.C. § 355(a) it is provided that if a corporation, referred to as the “distributing corporation,” distributes solely stock or securities of a corporation it controls, known as the “controlled corporation,” to its shareholder or security holder, and this distribution is not primarily intended to distribute earnings and profits of either the distributing corporation or the controlled corporation, then no gain or loss will be recognized. Additionally, no amount will be included in the income of the shareholder or security holder upon receiving such stock or securities. It should be noted that the subsequent sale or exchange of stock or securities by the distributees, except under a pre-existing arrangement, should not be interpreted as evidence that the distribution was primarily intended as a means to distribute earnings and profits.

Requirements as to active business. Under  26 U.S.C. § 355(b), provides that subsection (1) applies if the distributing corporation and the controlled corporation (or, in the case of multiple controlled corporations receiving stock, each of those corporations) are actively involved in conducting a trade or business immediately following the distribution, or (2) prior to the distribution, the distributing corporation held no assets except for stock or securities in the controlled corporations, and each of the controlled corporations is actively engaged in conducting a trade or business immediately after the distribution.

Insights:  IRS private letter rulings are not binding on any taxpayer except the taxpayer in issue in the PLR. However, the PLR presented here provides insight to potential tax consequences for recognition of gain or loss upon distribution of stock and securities of controlled corporations. The PLR offers an example of the necessary steps to prevent the imposition of taxes when transferring the stock of controlled corporations. It is recommended that shareholders seek tax advice prior to making any such corporate or tax-triggering decisions and to gain better understanding of whether the intended actions may result in undesirable tax liabilities, such as generating gains or losses.

 

Business Tax Planning Lawyer

Need assistance in managing the business planning processes? Freeman Law advises clients with corporate and other entity formations and reorganizations. Restructuring entities—through conversions, mergers, and liquidations—can involve particularly complex tax and regulatory considerations. Freeman Law provides experienced tax and business counsel, helping our clients achieve their organizational goals in a tax-efficient manner. Schedule a consultation or call (214) 984-3000 to discuss your corporate structuring or business and tax planning concerns.