What to Know About Fiduciary Duties and Fiduciary Litigation
A fiduciary is a person or entity that stands in a particular position of trust and responsibility to another. A fiduciary has a legal duty to the fiduciary’s principal or beneficiary. This fiduciary duty describes an obligation to act in the interest of the principal or beneficiary. It represents the highest standard of care imposed by the law.
A fiduciary relationship is typically marked by a relationship that involves a principal or beneficiary who places confidence, reliance, and trust in the fiduciary due to the fiduciary’s position, expertise, or authority. Typical examples of fiduciaries include executors, personal representatives, administrators, trustees, agents, partners, and powers of attorney.
Texas law recognizes two categories of fiduciary relationships or duties: formal and informal. Under Texas law, formal fiduciary duties arise as a matter of law as a result of certain formal and special relationships. For example, corporate directors and officers, employees, partners, trustees, principals, and other formal relationships may give rise to formal fiduciary duties.
Fiduciary duties can also arise “informally.” Informal fiduciary duties “arise from ‘a moral, social, domestic, or purely personal relationship of trust and confidence.’”
The Fiduciary Duty
Courts have recognized that “[a] fiduciary duty is the highest duty recognized by law.” Rawhide Mesa-Partners, Ltd. v. Brown McCarroll, L.L.P., 344 S.W.3d 56, 60 (Tex. App.— Eastland 2011, no pet.) As such, a fiduciary owes the beneficiary the duties of ” . . . loyalty and good faith, integrity of the strictest kind, fair, honest dealing, and the duty not to conceal matters which might influence his actions to his principal’s prejudice.” Hartford Cas. Ins. v. Walker County Agency, Inc., 808 S.W.2d 681, 688 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi 1991, no writ) (citing Douglas v. Aztec Petroleum Corp., 695 S.W.2d 312, 318 (Tex.App. – Tyler 1985, no writ)).
In general, a fiduciary owes his principal a high duty of good faith, fair dealing, honest performance, and strict accountability. Among the agent’s fiduciary duties to his principal are the duty not to compete with the principal on his own account in matters relating to the subject matter of the agency and the duty to deal fairly with the principal in all transactions between them. Commonly cited fiduciary duties include the duties of: (1) care, (2) loyalty, (3) accountability, (4) confidentiality, (5) full disclosure, (6) fairness, and (7) good faith and fidelity.
In Texas, a fiduciary’s duties are generally described as the following: a duty of loyalty, a duty of care, a duty of obedience, and a duty of good faith and fair dealing.
- Duty of Loyalty. Under the duty of loyalty, the fiduciary must act in good faith and not allow personal interests to prevail over corporate or other interests.
- Duty of Care. Under the duty of care, the fiduciary must perform his duties with the care that an ordinarily prudent person would use under similar circumstances. The duty of care requires diligence and prudence in managing the corporations’ or others’ affairs.
- Duty of Obedience. The duty of obedience requires a director or officer to avoid ultra vires actions.
- Duty of Good Faith. The duty of “good faith and fair dealing” is one of many duties that fiduciaries owe to each other. The duty of good faith and fair dealing requires parties to deal fairly with one another. As a fiduciary duty, it requires a party to place the interest of the other party before his own.
The Elements of a Breach of Fiduciary Duty
A claim for breach of fiduciary duty under Texas law requires the plaintiff to plead the following elements: “(1) the existence of a fiduciary duty, (2) breach of the duty, (3) causation, and (4) damages.” First United Pentecostal Church of Beaumont v. Parker, 514 S.W.3d 214, 220 (Tex. 2017); Punts v. Wilson, 137 S.W .3d 889, 891 (Tex. App.–Texarkana 2004); Kelly v. Gaines, 181 S.W.3d 394, 414 (Tex. App.–Waco 2005).
Damages for Breach of Fiduciary Duty
A successful plaintiff may recover the following types of damages for a breach of fiduciary duty claim in Texas:
- Actual damages and lost profits. “Actual damages” means damages recoverable at common law. These may include direct losses from the breach, as well as indirect or economic damages.
- Exemplary damages. An intentional breach of a fiduciary duty may give rise to punitive/exemplary damages.
- Other damages/remedies. Other remedies may also be available, such as constructive trust; forfeiture of fees; profit disgorgement; an accounting; rescission; injunction; and appointment or removal of a receiver or trustee.
Common scenarios that may give rise to fiduciary claims include misappropriation of assets by a trustee or agent, as well as embezzlement, commingling of assets, and self-dealing in the context of a fiduciary relationship.
 Rawhide Mesa-Partners, Ltd. v. Brown McCarroll, L.L.P., 344 S.W.3d 56, 60 (Tex. App.— Eastland 2011, no pet.) (“A fiduciary duty is the highest duty recognized by law.”).
The fiduciary owes the beneficiary the duties of ” . . . loyalty and good faith, integrity of the strictest kind, fair, honest dealing and the duty not to conceal matters which might influence his actions to his principal’s prejudice.” Hartford Cas. Ins. v. Walker County Agency, Inc., 808 S.W.2d 681, 688 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi 1991, no writ) (citing Douglas v. Aztec Petroleum Corp., 695 S.W.2d 312, 318 (Tex.App. – Tyler 1985, no writ)).
 Jones v. Blume, 196 S.W.3d 440, 447 (Tex. App.–Dallas 2006) (“A fiduciary relationship may be formal or informal. Fiduciary duties arise as a matter of law in certain formal relationships, including attorney-client and trustee relationships.”)
 Courts have recognized a fiduciary duty owed by corporate officers and directors to the corporation, which prohibits officers and directors from usurping corporate opportunities for personal gain and requires them to exercise their “uncorrupted business judgment for the sole benefit of the corporation.”
 When a fiduciary relationship of agency exists between employee and employer, the employee has a duty to act primarily for the benefit of the employer in matters connected with his agency. The employee has a duty to deal openly with the employer and to fully disclose to the employer information about matters affecting the company’s business.
 Fitz–Gerald v. Hull, 150 Tex. 39, 237 S.W.2d 256, 264 (1951) (“The relationship between … partners … is fiduciary in character, and imposes upon all the participants the obligation of loyalty to the joint concern and of the utmost good faith, fairness, and honesty in their dealings with each other with respect to matters pertaining to the enterprise.”)
 Most informal relationships, such as friendships or even familial relationships, will not necessarily give rise to any special relationship that imposes fiduciary duties on the parties. Jones v. Thompson, 338 S.W.3d 573, 583–84 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2010, pet. denied) (mere subjective trust resulting from an informal and confidential relationship does not create a fiduciary relationship) (citing Schlumberger Tech. Corp. v. Swanson, 959 S.W.2d 171, 177 (Tex. 1997) (Texas courts are reluctant to recognize informal fiduciary relationships)).
Need assistance in managing the Tax Compliance process? Freeman Law can help businesses and individuals manage critical tax risks and make sense of complex international tax compliance rules. We offer value-driven legal services and provide practical solutions to complex tax issues. Schedule a consultation or call (214) 984-3410 to discuss your tax concerns.