Gray v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2026-61 | July 27, 2026 | Arbeit, J. | Dkt. No. 11390-25

Share this Article
Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Twitter Icon
Devin M. Hludzik

Devin M. Hludzik

Attorney

469.998.8488
DHludzik@FreemanLaw.com

Ms. Hludzik represents clients in various stages of litigation, with a particular focus on federal tax controversies, as well as white-collar and financial disputes, both civil and criminal. She has experience on an array of issues, including IRS collections and federal investigations, and represents clients facing tax and white-collar or financial-related charges. Prior to joining private practice, Ms. Hludzik clerked for two judges at the United States Tax Court. 

Ms. Hludzik earned her B.S., cum laude, from the University of Central Florida. She earned her J.D., cum laude, from Charleston School of Law. After law school, she received her LL.M. in taxation from Georgetown University Law Center. Ms. Hludzik is licensed to practice in Texas and South Carolina.

The Tax Court in Brief 

Freeman Law’s “The Tax Court in Brief” covers substantive Tax Court opinion, providing a brief of its decisions in clear, concise prose.

For a link to our podcast covering the Tax Court in Brief, download here or check out other episodes of The Freeman Law Project.

Short Summary: Taxpayer timely filed her 2022 federal income tax return reporting approximately $65,085 in wages but reported none of the $26,268 in Social Security benefits she received during the tax year. The benefits were reported to her on Form SSA-1099, and she did not dispute receiving them. After examining the return, the IRS determined that $22,328—representing 85% of the benefits—was includible in gross income under I.R.C. § 86 and issued a notice of deficiency determining an additional income tax liability of $4,917. Rejecting Taxpayer’s arguments that Social Security benefits are categorically exempt from income taxation and that taxation of those benefits constitutes unconstitutional “double taxation,” the Tax Court reaffirmed that Congress expressly subjected Social Security benefits to federal income tax under specified income thresholds and that longstanding precedent forecloses constitutional challenges to I.R.C. § 86.

Key Issue: Whether Taxpayer was required under I.R.C. § 86 to include a portion of her Social Security benefits in gross income for tax year 2022 where her modified adjusted gross income exceeded the applicable statutory base and adjusted base amounts.

Primary Holdings: The Tax Court held that Taxpayer was required to include 85% of her Social Security benefits in gross income under I.R.C. § 86 because her modified adjusted gross income exceeded the statutory thresholds.

Key Points of Law:

Unreported Income

Social Security Benefits

Insights:  The $25,000 and $34,000 thresholds in I.R.C. § 86 are income thresholds, not exclusions based solely on the amount of Social Security benefits received. Once modified adjusted gross income exceeds the statutory thresholds, up to 85 percent of Social Security benefits may become taxable. Arguments that Social Security benefits are exempt from tax because they constitute double taxation are likely unsuccessful. And, on another note, this case illustrates that where the underlying facts are undisputed and the dispute concerns only the legal consequences of those facts, Rule 122 submissions remain an efficient procedural vehicle for resolving the case without trial.