Barrios v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2026-32 | April 16, 2026 | Urda, C.J. | Dkt. No. 14691-24

Share this Article
Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Twitter Icon
Devin M. Hludzik

Devin M. Hludzik

Attorney

469.998.8488
DHludzik@FreemanLaw.com

Ms. Hludzik represents clients in various stages of litigation, with a particular focus on federal tax controversies, as well as white-collar and financial disputes, both civil and criminal. She has experience on an array of issues, including IRS collections and federal investigations, and represents clients facing tax and white-collar or financial-related charges. Prior to joining private practice, Ms. Hludzik clerked for two judges at the United States Tax Court. 

Ms. Hludzik earned her B.S., cum laude, from the University of Central Florida. She earned her J.D., cum laude, from Charleston School of Law. After law school, she received her LL.M. in taxation from Georgetown University Law Center. Ms. Hludzik is licensed to practice in Texas and South Carolina.

Short Summary: Taxpayer filed a 2022 federal income tax return reporting total income of $8,964. The IRS determined he had received an additional $15,206 in nonemployee compensation from Antigua Floral & Styling, LLC, based on a Form 1099-NEC, and issued a deficiency notice for $3,842. In his petition, Taxpayer asserted that he did not report the income because the tax forms were mailed to a prior address and were received only after he filed his return. Taxpayer did not respond to the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, did not appear at the scheduled hearing, and did not respond to a final opportunity to do so. Although Taxpayer failed to respond to the motion, the Court nevertheless considered the merits and concluded that no genuine dispute of material fact existed.

Key Issue: Whether taxpayer failed to report $15,206 in nonemployee compensation for tax year 2022.

Primary Holdings: The Tax Court granted the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment. The IRS established an evidentiary foundation linking Taxpayer to the unreported income through IRS account transcripts and the Form 1099-NEC, thereby supporting the deficiency determination. Taxpayer did not contest receiving the income and failed to show any basis for excluding it. The deficiency of $3,842 was sustained.

Key Points of Law:

Summary Judgment

Unreported Income

Insights: Because Taxpayer did not respond to the motion for summary judgment, the Tax Court could have entered its decision against him for that reason alone. Taxpayers are responsible for reporting all income regardless of whether they receive the corresponding tax forms or not. A taxpayer’s obligation to report taxable income exists independently of whether the taxpayer receives an information return such as Form 1099. Taxpayers who receive a notice of deficiency should also engage in any resulting Tax Court proceedings. Failing to respond to motions or appear at hearings may leave the Court with an undisputed record on which to rule.